Comments on: Conditional GET Request http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/ Anything to develop, developed, ideas for , to and by the Web Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:18:59 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: diamonds http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-5438 diamonds Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:41:06 +0000 http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-5438 How can the ETag be implemented? How can the ETag be implemented?

]]> By: gem : rufus-verbs « processi http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-5423 gem : rufus-verbs « processi Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:25:22 +0000 http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-5423 [...] your resource server allows it, you can take advantage of conditional GETs via rufus-verbs’ ConditionalEndPoint [...] [...] your resource server allows it, you can take advantage of conditional GETs via rufus-verbs’ ConditionalEndPoint [...]

]]> By: Chris http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-4471 Chris Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:36:10 +0000 http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-4471 From your post: "RFC 2616 specifies that if If-None-Match is not accompanied with If-Modified-Since then the server must not send a 304 (Not Modified) header." I don't think that's what it says. I believe it says that if a client supplies both If-None-Match and If-Modified-Since, then both must match the expected value. But the client is not compelled to supply both. From your post: “RFC 2616 specifies that if If-None-Match is not accompanied with If-Modified-Since then the server must not send a 304 (Not Modified) header.”

I don’t think that’s what it says. I believe it says that if a client supplies both If-None-Match and If-Modified-Since, then both must match the expected value. But the client is not compelled to supply both.

]]> By: George Forma http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-1494 George Forma Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:40:58 +0000 http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-1494 Nice overview and details, really clear explanation of the 304 issue. You might enjoy this article about server-side caching http://www.askapache.com/2006/htaccess/speed-up-sites-with-htaccess-caching.html Nice overview and details, really clear explanation of the 304 issue.

You might enjoy this article about server-side caching http://www.askapache.com/2006/htaccess/speed-up-sites-with-htaccess-caching.html

]]> By: GET / HTTP/1.1 » Blog Archive » Ajax Mistakes http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-4 GET / HTTP/1.1 » Blog Archive » Ajax Mistakes Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:53:10 +0000 http://ruturajv.wordpress.com/2005/12/27/conditional-get-request/#comment-4 [...] When calling for a Document, Page, etc. Its best to use a URL (A unique Identifier for that document). Its the way the web is structured. Try using Apache’s mod_rewrite to make the URL readable. DO NOT FETCH SUCH DOCUMENTS WITH AJAX.The standard GET request is structured in such a way that if you are opening the same page, document again. The browser may not waste the bandwidth at all. Unlike AJAX. The browser could simply display from the cache. See: Conditional GET Request [...] [...] When calling for a Document, Page, etc. Its best to use a URL (A unique Identifier for that document). Its the way the web is structured. Try using Apache’s mod_rewrite to make the URL readable. DO NOT FETCH SUCH DOCUMENTS WITH AJAX.The standard GET request is structured in such a way that if you are opening the same page, document again. The browser may not waste the bandwidth at all. Unlike AJAX. The browser could simply display from the cache. See: Conditional GET Request [...]

]]>